Two notes with the same serial number
In the British Museum, two 500 Escudo notes with the same number are displayed side-by-side. One of them is stamped as invalid.

In the British Museum in London, two Portuguese 500 Escudo notes are placed side-by-side. They are from the year 1922. The upper one is stamped with DUPLICADO—duplicate, and has been invalidated. The lower one is a legitimate note.
Both notes have the same serial number: 1K 02201.
A forgery without engraved plates
In 1925, a man named Alves dos Reis made his move. He did not engrave plates or imitate the paper. Instead, he created a forged letter of authorization and ordered the printing of banknotes from a printing company in London.
The company believed it was a legitimate order and printed them: with the real plates, on the real paper, using the official process. The printed banknotes were then transported to Portugal without authorization.
They were indistinguishable. Naturally. Because the same company had printed them with the same plates.
Where authenticity resides
So, is this a counterfeit note?
As an object, it is genuine. In terms of authority, it is counterfeit. The authenticity of currency does not lie with the paper. It lies in a single point: who authorized its issuance.
The paper and plates were genuine; the only thing missing was the authority to issue.
The inscription (the text printed on banknotes and coins) would also tell you that this note is genuine. The only place the answer changes is in the issuance ledger.
What the incident destroyed
After the scheme was exposed, the credibility of the Bank of Portugal was severely damaged. The task of determining how many notes had entered circulation proved difficult. People began to doubt whether the paper in their hands was genuine.
Compounded by political turmoil, the military staged a coup d'état the following year, 1926. The credibility of the currency was contiguous with the credibility of the government.
However, the extent to which a direct causal link can be drawn between the incident and the political upheaval has not been established. The figures for the amount that entered circulation also vary by source, so they will not be cited here. What is certain is the single fact that the two notes bear the same number.
Exhibition as a counterargument
These two notes are displayed openly. This is because showing the counterfeit alongside the genuine best explains what currency is.
If the thing that separates genuine from counterfeit does not lie in the material, then it lies in the system. The system is invisible. To make the invisible visible, the two notes were placed side-by-side, sharing the same number.
More in Reading a coin

The Fate of Gold, Divided by Its Use
The Toyotomi faction converted the gold and silver left by Hideyoshi into military power, while Tokugawa Ieyasu established a monetary system valid throughout the country. This is the story of how gold and silver from the same era met completely opposite ends depending on how they were used.

The Value of the Yen as Defined by the 20 Yen Gold Coin
The old 20 yen gold coin was the highest denomination established by the New Coinage Act. The value of this coin, which equated one yen to 1.5 grams of pure gold, was halved in the 30th year of Meiji. Behind this was the war indemnity left in London.

The Fate of Paper Inscribed with "Time Flies"
In the center, "FUGIO" (time flies) and a sundial; below it, "MIND YOUR BUSINESS." Printed to finance the War of Independence, the Continental currency, contrary to its motto, lost its value and left an idiom in the English language.
If you would like to read on
Everything in these pieces comes from the material itself.