The 1922 notes
Two Portuguese 500 escudo notes are displayed side-by-side.
1K 02201
Both have the same serial number.
In the British Museum, two 500 Escudo notes with the same number are displayed side-by-side. One of them is stamped as invalid.
Two Banknotes with the Same Number in 3 Minutes
Swipe to see more
The 1922 notes
Two Portuguese 500 escudo notes are displayed side-by-side.
1K 02201
Both have the same serial number.
Today
The top note is stamped "Duplicate." The bottom one is a genuine note.
1925
A man created a fake request and placed an order with a foreign printing company.
After that
The company printed the notes as usual, using the real plates and real paper.
They were impossible to tell apart. Same company, same plates.
Looking back
The paper and plates were real. The only thing missing was the authority to issue them.
After they were discovered
The bank's credibility was damaged, and people began to doubt the notes in their hands.
The next year, 1926, the military staged a coup.
Today
The two notes are displayed together, not hidden, to show us what money really is.
1K 02201
The serial number on both 500 escudo notes. They are identical.
A banknote is printed by the real printing company, using the real plates and real paper. But the bank never said it was okay to print it. Is this note real or fake?
Pick one
As a physical object, it's real. Even the text on the note would tell you it's a genuine bill.
In terms of authority, it's fake. The authenticity of money isn't about the paper, but about the single point of who authorized its issue.
Both answers are half right. The only thing that changes the answer is on the side of the invisible ledger of issuance.

In the British Museum in London, two Portuguese 500 Escudo notes are placed side-by-side. They are from the year 1922. The upper one is stamped with DUPLICADO—duplicate, and has been invalidated. The lower one is a legitimate note.
Both notes have the same serial number: 1K 02201.
In 1925, a man named Alves dos Reis made his move. He did not engrave plates or imitate the paper. Instead, he created a forged letter of authorization and ordered the printing of banknotes from a printing company in London.
The company believed it was a legitimate order and printed them: with the real plates, on the real paper, using the official process. The printed banknotes were then transported to Portugal without authorization.
They were indistinguishable. Naturally. Because the same company had printed them with the same plates.
So, is this a counterfeit note?
As an object, it is genuine. In terms of authority, it is counterfeit. The authenticity of currency does not lie with the paper. It lies in a single point: who authorized its issuance.
The paper and plates were genuine; the only thing missing was the authority to issue.
The inscription (the text printed on banknotes and coins) would also tell you that this note is genuine. The only place the answer changes is in the issuance ledger.
After the scheme was exposed, the credibility of the Bank of Portugal was severely damaged. The task of determining how many notes had entered circulation proved difficult. People began to doubt whether the paper in their hands was genuine.
Compounded by political turmoil, the military staged a coup d'état the following year, 1926. The credibility of the currency was contiguous with the credibility of the government.
However, the extent to which a direct causal link can be drawn between the incident and the political upheaval has not been established. The figures for the amount that entered circulation also vary by source, so they will not be cited here. What is certain is the single fact that the two notes bear the same number.
These two notes are displayed openly. This is because showing the counterfeit alongside the genuine best explains what currency is.
If the thing that separates genuine from counterfeit does not lie in the material, then it lies in the system. The system is invisible. To make the invisible visible, the two notes were placed side-by-side, sharing the same number.

In 1668, a single coin born in Kameido, Edo, brought an end to the era of imported coins. This coin would survive famines and continue to be legal tender in Japan until the Shōwa era.

Yongle Tongbao coins were minted in Ming China, but hardly circulated within the country. There was a country that minted coins for export which it did not use itself, and a country that did not mint its own coins but used imported ones as its standard.

The shogunate began minting the domestic Kan'ei Tsūhō coin the year before the Shimabara Rebellion. In an age when the bodies of those unable to pay taxes became collateral, a domestic coin was created for the first time in 678 years.
The rest of the story is in the material of NOMISMA.
Price
After purchase, the full courses, the illustrated books, every country’s story and the numismatics examination are open to you.
See the price →