7th–6th century BCE
In three separate lands, money was born at around the same time.
Lydia (West), China (East), and India (South)
We will compare the early coinage of the three regions to consider their commonalities and the extent to which they can be said to have been invented independently.
Time to read the text: about 6 min
The review questions are optional and not included in this time.
What you can read: the course opening and contents are free; the full text is for those who have purchased
After purchase, you can read the full text once your access starts.
The Beginning of Money in Three Lands: A 3-Minute Guide
Swipe to see more
7th–6th century BCE
In three separate lands, money was born at around the same time.
Lydia (West), China (East), and India (South)
Around 600 BCE
The king of Lydia stamped a lion's seal on lumps of metal from a river.
A mark from the state, guaranteeing the weight and contents.
With the seal, people no longer had to weigh and check the metal every time.
The innovation in the West was the 'guarantee'.
China made coins with holes by pouring metal into molds. They were counted by stringing them together.
The innovation in the East was 'mass production and counting'.
6th century BCE
In India, they stamped small pieces of silver with many marks, like suns and animals.
The innovation in the South was 'overlapping marks'.
What they had in common wasn't the shape, but the need to trade with strangers.
All three had trade, cities, and the power to stamp marks.
Why at the same time? Was it a coincidence, were the conditions right, or did the idea spread?
Every theory has a wall that's hard to get past.
With current evidence, 'separate inventions' is the strongest theory. New discoveries could change that.
'Absence of evidence' is not 'evidence of absence'.
3lands
The lands where money was born. The materials, methods, and shapes were all different.
There's a theory that the idea of money spread between the three lands. To test this theory, what would you look for first?
Pick one
Exactly. This is the wall for this theory. If the idea had spread, there should be traces in the lands in between, but no such objects have been found.
The main obstacle mentioned in our lesson is physical evidence, rather than written records. If the idea had spread, there should be traces in the lands in between. Those haven't been found yet.
However, just because something hasn't been found doesn't prove it never existed. We won't jump to conclusions and will wait for new discoveries.

Course number: C01
Supervised by: Mitsuru Hayama
Beyond the text: 7 exercises · 1 coins · 6 readings How reading times are calculated
You can start this course without reading any other course.
7 exercises in this course (4 check, 1 compare, 2 written). Progress is recorded by self-assessment.
Read next
The People Who Unified Nations and Changed Money →What you learn next: You can explain why a unifier lays hands on the coinage first.
Time to read the text: about 8 min / What you can read: the course opening and contents are free; the full text is for those who have purchased
Price
After purchase, the full courses, the illustrated books, every country’s story and the numismatics examination are open to you.
See the price →