Observe photographs, compare potential attributions and dates, and document the evidence for your research.
Time to read the text: about 8 min / Time to read the in-depth book: about 75 min The review questions are optional and not included in this time. What you can read: the course opening and contents are free; the full text is for those who have purchased After purchase, you can read the full text once your access starts.
Choose your starting point based on your goal. Look at the type, the actual object, an excavated item, or the words.
The number of items in a collection can change, so go and check for yourself.
2 / 8
When you say, "No one has said this before," also write down the scope of your search.
Stating your scope isn't being humble, it's protecting yourself.
3 / 8
Draw the line with these two questions: Are you using the original words? And did you cite your source?
Even if you rephrase it, it's plagiarism without a source.
4 / 8
If you give something a name, define what it means in the same document.
If you don't, the name will take on a life of its own.
5 / 8
1566
Why do prices rise? They argued whether it was about "appearance" or "substance."
Instead of who won or lost, read to see what needed to be confirmed to settle the matter.
6 / 8
1781
The king's household budget was published for the first time. But it didn't include temporary expenses.
The columns that were left blank spoke volumes.
7 / 8
1858
The famous phrase "bad money drives out good" was named much later.
Write about the event, the name, and the year of re-examination separately.
8 / 8
When you argue against something, present the opposing view in its strongest form.
Leave behind your own standard and a prediction that can be tested.
2In numbers
1858year
The year the idea of "bad money drives out good" was named as a law after a person.
3What would you do?
I rephrased something I read in a book and wrote it in my report. I didn't cite the source. Is that okay?
Pick one
Since I rephrased it, it's fine as is.
Actually, this is also plagiarism. Because you borrowed the content, not just the words.
Add the source of the book I read.
This makes it a "summary." You put it in your own words and show the source. The only two things that draw the line are whether you used the original words and whether you cited the source.
This is also why all the diagrams at NOMISMA have a "Source" field.
If you want to know more about checking sources (optional)
Is It Really True? Checking History We re-examine the origins of money and famous anecdotes, comparing them with historical records and actual artifacts.
Assessment
11 exercises in this course (7 check, 0 compare, 4 written). Progress is recorded by self-assessment.
The 8 chapters of this course
Choose the entry point by your purposeChoose the entry by your purpose: type, object, find, or debate. Do not write down numbers that move.
Verifying that "no one has said it yet"Exhaustiveness is impossible, so write down the range you searched. Stating the range is not modesty but defence.
Where quotation, summary and plagiarism divideThere are only two axes: are the words the original's, and did you show the source? Rewording without a source is still plagiarism.
Naming, and what cannot be verifiedA name makes debate easier and, at the same time, stops the content from being questioned. If you name it, define it too.
Anatomy of a Controversy — Three Hundred Years of Debate Over PricesA strong debate leaves behind the question of 'what must be verified to settle the matter?'. Rather than focusing on winning or losing, one should examine the verification methods that remain.
The Art of Disclosure — The Surplus Shown, the Blank Space UnseenPublication is a revolutionary practice. But a publication that does not state what it has omitted becomes a machine for printing illusions.
The Archaeology of Names — Gresham and TulipsBoth the law's name and the bubble's story were recast later. Investigate the dates of the name and the substance separately.
The art of opposition — Frame it in the form of a strong opponent.A good dissenting opinion presents the opponent's argument in its strongest form, clearly states its own criteria, and leaves a verifiable prediction.
Real-life examples in this course (10)
Gresham and the recoinage Britain 1560–1858 London, and a study of a later age §4. A case where the name and the law do not match. Read the sequel to "a twist of history" in the original.
"The Crime of 1873" United States the 1870s America, the West and the South §4. The scene where naming becomes politics. Both the claim and the rebuttal are written.
Newton's Great Recoinage Britain 1696 The mint in the Tower of London The great recoinage. Material for seeing how the record of a controversy survived.
The changing of the reserve currency Britain 1944 The conference hall at Bretton Woods Bretton Woods. The record of a delegate who put forward a plan against his own country's interest.
The century of silver and the price revolution France 1566–1568 A study in the Parlement of Paris Section 5. Please read this while considering the seeds of the quantity theory of money, including the reservation that "Bodin was not the first."
Louis XVI and the reformers France 1781 The printing houses and bookshops of Paris Section 6. The missing column is the most eloquent—a cautionary tale regarding the practice of public disclosure.
The anchor groans United States 1960 Washington, the Congress Section 8. A warning, voiced in parliament, about a flaw written into the system's very blueprint.
We are bankrupt Greece December 1893 The rostrum of the Chamber The famous quote, "Unfortunately, we are bankrupt," is found neither in parliamentary records nor in contemporary newspapers. This section traces the verification process that revealed its sole source to be a single memoir.
Paper money without paper China from 2014 The room where the research began When writing about an ongoing event, where does one draw the line? Research began in 2014, trials between 2019 and 2020—this is a passage where the decision was made to write only the verifiable years.
Chop mark Mexico 17th–19th centuries The global flow of silver Some studies suggest around one-third, while some researchers believe it exceeds 40%. This is a practical example of how the direction of silver flow can be stated with certainty, even when a wide range remains in the figures.
References
ANS Digital Library — American Numismatic Society An open-access repository of numismatic dissertations, auction catalogues, and e-books. 150 years of publications available to read for free.
The books and materials referred to in this course.