Using the arguments of John Law and Ogiwara Shigehide as a starting point, we will consider the relationship between material and face value.
Time to read the text: about 8 min The review questions are optional and not included in this time. What you can read: the course opening and contents are free; the full text is for those who have purchased After purchase, you can read the full text once your access starts.
There's an idea that a country, not the material inside, decides the value of money.
Money based on agreement, not the metal it's made of.
2 / 8
Genroku era
Ogiwara Shigehide of Japan is said to have claimed he could "make even rubble pass as currency."
It's impossible to verify if he actually said this himself.
3 / 8
Shares in John Law's company in France rose from 500 to 10,000.
It wasn't the substance, but expectations that grew 20-fold.
4 / 8
1796
In Paris, the tools for printing paper money were burned in public.
To show everyone, "We won't print any more."
5 / 8
Paper money is vulnerable to counterfeits. In wartime, fake bills were even used as a weapon.
It becomes impossible to tell which bills are real.
6 / 8
In the Netherlands, the balance in a bank's ledger itself became money.
Merchants' practical needs came first, before the theory.
7 / 8
November 1923
Germany's new currency made people believe the promise "not to overprint," and prices stabilized.
It was backed by land—something that can't be easily created.
8 / 8
1971–
All money today is based on agreement. The conditions are enduring pain and having an independent watchdog.
Watchdog = A central bank that is independent of politics.
2In numbers
20times
Shares in Law's company: from 500 livres to about 10,000 livres
3What would you do?
You are a government official. You've printed so much paper money that no one trusts it. How do you convince people you will "print no more"?
Pick one
Declare that you "won't print any more."
They had already broken the promise to "print no more" many times, so words alone were not believable.
Burn the printing equipment in public.
This actually happened in 1796, when the copper plates and molds for making banknotes were burned in a public square in Paris. It showed everyone that printing was now impossible.
It took more than words; it took creating an irreversible fact. That's what was needed to make the promise believable.
You can explain for what purpose a "ceremony showing the death of a system" was held.
Can explain, with reservations, the traditional accounts of Ogiwara Shigehide's words and the reinterpretation of him as a forerunner of nominalism.
Can discuss the conditions under which nominal value functions (confidence in the governing discipline), using a pair of successful and unsuccessful examples.
You can start this course without reading any other course.
Also worth reading, to see the connections (optional)
Face Value and Intrinsic Value What you learn: You can explain the gap between nominal and real value using one concrete coin. The text refers to this course in section 2.
If you want to know more about checking sources (optional)
Is It Really True? Checking History We re-examine the origins of money and famous anecdotes, comparing them with historical records and actual artifacts.
Assessment
11 exercises in this course (7 check, 1 compare, 3 written). Progress is recorded by self-assessment.
The 8 chapters of this course
The more quotable the line, the harder you check its sourceThe more attractive the quotation, the more carefully you measure the distance from the person. If far, write "it is said."
Turning paper into shares — John Law's deviceThe nominal can part from the real, but there is no limit on how fast. Expectation can double overnight.
Showing the death of a system in public"We will print no more" cannot be believed as words. You must create a fact that cannot be undone.
Forged notes used as a weaponNominalist paper is weak against forgery, because the fact you decreed stops reaching people. Traces remain even in newspapers.
The Man Reinterpreted as a Forerunner — Ogiwara ShigehideThe phrase "with rubble" is a legend. However, a re-interpretation can be established separately from the legend's authenticity.
A Name Independent in the Ledger — The Quiet Experiment of the CarolusguldenA unit free from both gold and silver. Nominalism was realized in merchants' ledgers before it became an ideology.
The Men Who Designed Trust — The Proof of the RentenmarkInflation was halted with the symbolic backing of a mortgage on land. A successful example of a nominalist experiment.
Conditions for Survival in the Age of Fiat — Pain and IndependenceIn the modern era of fiat currency, the conditions for survival are enduring pain and the independence of the watchdog.
Readings (8)
The century of recoinage Japan 1658–1713 the finance office, Edo §1. Read it including the quotation and the note on its source.
John Law's bubble France 1717–1720 The Mississippi and Paris §2. The explanation of the device of turning debt into shares.
The paper they printed too much of France 1796–1797 Place Vendôme, Paris §3. The scene of the ceremony burning the instrument in public.
The continental currency United States 1775–1779 New York, under British occupation §4. The scene where forgery becomes a weapon of economic war.
Money on the ledger Netherlands the 17th century The canal streets of Amsterdam Section 6. Ledger balances become money—practical nominalism.
The miracle of the Rentenmark Germany 1923–1924 The office of the currency commissioner Section 7. The Currency Board as the personification of discipline.
The Two Rubles Russia 1789 Paris Two types of paper money, deriving their names from the same root, had different backings: one was backed by confiscated church lands, the other by its convertibility to copper coins. Please focus not on why their names are similar, but on the difference in their backing.